The Guardian, March 06,2011
The government faces mounting criticism over the Gibe III dam – for not consulting the communities affected by it and for attempting to silence dissent
There is particular concern over the Gibe III dam being built on the Omo river, the largest infrastructure project in Ethiopian history. Campaigners say it threatens the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands of people in the South Omo region and around Lake Turkana in Kenya .
The Lower Omo Valley , a Unesco World Heritage Site, is home to agro-pastoralists from eight distinct indigenous groups who depend on the Omo river's annual flood to support riverbank cultivation and grazing lands for livestock.
Launching a new five-year development plan in August last year, the Ethiopian prime minister, Meles Zenawi, vowed to complete the dam "at any cost" and lashed out at Survival International and other critics, saying, "They don't want to see developed Africa; they want us to remain undeveloped and backward to serve their tourists as a museum … These people talk about the hazard of building dams after they have already completed building dams in their country."
However, Peter Bosshard, policy director for International Rivers, one of the groups involved in the campaign against Gibe III(pdf), says that international groups had to speak out because local campaigners had effectively been silenced. He said members of affected communities were not consulted; anybody even suspected of opposing the dam risks suffering serious consequences.
"Western governments have found themselves on the wrong side of history in the revolutions in the
Ikal Angelei, director of the Kenyan charity Friends of Lake Turkana, believes the dam also threatens the existence of communities living around the lake – which is fed by the Omo river – most of whom are residents of Kenya . Describing the dam as "the most outrageous social injustice of our time", she insists a comprehensive impact assessment is required, "capturing the entire Omo river, both in Kenya and Ethiopia , and its effects on the hydrology of Lake Turkana as well as the entire ecosystem".
Last month saw protests outside the Chinese embassy in Nairobi , with campaigners calling on Beijing to halt funding for the scheme. Angelei says the Nairobi government is divided on the issue, but that at least protests are legal in Kenya , unlike in Ethiopia , and she urges donors to heed Human Rights Watch's concerns that "funds given to Ethiopia are not used to oppress its people".
Maybe they will move to
Although progress on Gibe III has been considerably delayed by funding constraints,
Ethiopia's plans for constructing dams on the Nile have traditionally met with robust opposition from Egypt, which has tried to maintain control of more than half of the Nile's flow through the colonial era Nile Waters Agreement, as well as through threats of armed force.
Perhaps reflecting Cairo 's recent decline as regional strongman, Burundi last week joined five other upstream nations in the new Nile Basin Initiative, creating the two-thirds majority of riverine states required to put the new treaty into force, and thereby effectively wresting control of the Nile waters from Egypt and Sudan . It threatens Egypt 's right to 55.5bn cubic metres annually, conferred by the previous agreement.
Protestors from the Stop Gibe III campaign have arranged a further day of action picketing Ethiopian embassies across Europe on 22 March to coincide with World Water Day.
With Ethiopia due to become the leading recipient of bilateral UK development assistance, following last week's review of Britain's aid expenditure there is mounting criticism of its government's rush to extend its hydroelectric programme and lease out large tracts of newly irrigated land to foreign investors without full consultation of communities affected by the schemes.
No comments:
Post a Comment